Enhanced predictability and axis precision of SMILE Pro, a retrospective analysis of myopic astigmatism correction (2026)
İlter İritaş, Ziya Burke
Search comparable cohorts while keeping procedure, device, follow-up, denominator, and publication source attached to every result.
Every card opens its stored study record and links onward to the original publication.
İlter İritaş, Ziya Burke
Haiyan He, Zhanchi Hu, Runhua Peng, Liangqi Feng, Chi Xiao
Rohit Shetty, Abha Shah, Prabhjot Singh, Raghav Narasimhan, Abhijit Sinha Roy, Anushree Bhatkal, Pooja Khamar
Hongyu Kong, Lingling Niu, Junfeng Li, Li Wang, Xiaoying Wang, Xingtao Zhou, Yishan Qian
Lukas Neuhann, Amir Javadi, Stefan Kassumeh, Paul Emesz, Niklas Mohr, Anke Messerschmidt-Roth, Walter Sekundo, Martin Bechmann, Rainer Wiltfang, Martin Dirisamer, Siegfried G Priglinger, Nikolaus Luft
Wu L, Xie X, Lai M, Fan X, Lin C
What the studies tell us, what they leave out, and which questions are worth taking to a consultation.
There is no universal winner. Here is a more honest way to compare the main refractive procedures.
Read guide →One week, one month and three months are not versions of the same number. They are different moments in recovery.
Read guide →The eye chart matters. So do night vision, comfort, predictability and the details that only patients tend to mention.
Read guide →*Eye totals are descriptive sums of reported arm enrollment and may include overlapping populations.